My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

Personal favorites

Search my library


Library Thing


Victorian Studies

Authors

Fine Arts

Buy Books!

Sitemeter

Amazon

« Irritated exclamation, prompted by a combination of student drafts and the accidental erasure of a post on Victorian historical fiction | Main | Warning: crass materialism ahead! »

February 22, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451aed169e200d83456f91e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Narrative:

» History Carnival III from The Elfin Ethicist
The third History Carnival is up at detrimental postulation (a few additional entries are here). There are several good discussions of theory as well as of particular topics and events. Here are some of the... [Read More]

Comments

anonymous coward

Thank you for introducing me to the work of Mrs. Alcock. Calvinism necessarily has God moving in history, and as Treitschke said, “Jede Epoche ist unmittelbar zu Gott.” Predestination (God does it, but it’s your fault) is explained in Romans 9: an example there is God’s hardening Pharoah’s heart every time he agrees to let the Hebrews go. So Pharoah is repeatedly punished, and it’s God’s doing. Not mentioned, but part of this theme is Uzzah, who thought he knew better than God what was necessary to the Ark.

A superb historical novelist (Swiss, 19th century) is Conrad Ferdinand Meyer, who writes on Calvinist historical themes presumably for the reasons above. His best Calvnist work is Juerg Jenatsch, the story of a Calvinist preacher turned rebel who saves his country by committing a monstrous betrayal. It’s a great novel, a great historical novel, and need not spell its lesson out for the reader can see very plainly that God raised up the man who was necessary at that hour, and cast him off again when God’s purpose was served. What are we to make of Jenatsch? A man who gave not just his life but his soul for his country, a frightening example of God’s omnipotence. And Meyer had the benefit of a language less changed than our own from the 17th century to now, so that the speeches are convincing rather than stilted.

The comments to this entry are closed.