My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

Currently reading...

Personal favorites

Search my library


Library Thing


Victorian Studies

Authors

Fiction

Fine Arts

Buy Books!

Blogs, Book- and Academia-Related

Sitemeter

Amazon

« The Boy Martyr; Or, Manfresti's Page. A Story of 1567 | Main | Further adventures in YouTube: Fred Astaire »

September 10, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451aed169e200e54eeefcb48834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yet further reflections on GoogleBooks:

Comments

Arnold

You are more charitable than I am. I don't think it's simply a question of a few "annoying little details", I think the whole enterprise is profoundly flawed. Google were in too much of a hurry, and plunged into the project without taking a long hard look at what was involved, or consulting scholars or librarians who could have warned them about some of the bibliographical complexities of nineteenth-century books. The attitude was, "let's grab the data, and any problems can be sorted out afterwards". And the result? A lack of reliable metadata, and chaotic search results with a huge number of false positives.

I wonder if Google are even aware of the extent of the problem? The attitude now seems to be, "we've got the data, let's add lots of cool applications" -- so, for example, little maps keep on popping up unexpectedly, providing you with a visual gazetteer to all the places mentioned in, say, the poetical works of Robert Southey; a classic example of misplaced ingenuity if ever I saw one.

I'm sorry to sound like an old fogey; I know I should be singing the praises of this wonderful new scholarly resource and all the research possibilities it opens up; but to be honest, I'm starting to find it slightly scary. One of the libraries I use regularly is now proposing to discard the majority of its older open-shelf reference material, including a complete run of Notes and Queries going right back to 1849. When I protested about this I was told curtly, "anyone who needs it can find it on Google Books".

Ianthe

My problem with Google books is that the people doing the scanning seem somewhat--unaware?--of what they are doing. I got to page 180 of Catherine Gore's _Mothers and Daughters_ and realized that only the first volume had been digitalized. AARGH!

The comments to this entry are closed.