Judith Halberstam: Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters
Ilana M Blumberg: Victorian Sacrifice (Literature, Religion, & Postsecular Stud)
« "The Lollards' Tower" |
| This Week's Acquistions »
I must say that given what I normally read, second-rate Walter Scott reads like Tolstoy.
July 19, 2011 in Books, Scattered Musings | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451aed169e2014e89faa5c7970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Random literary observation of the day:
This reminds me of a blog post I read yesterday about being covered with the smell of cat pee. What I mean is that it's so wonderful *not* to smell like cat pee. But we forget when not exposed to it for a long time. Everything truly is relative.
July 21, 2011 at 10:40 AM
I once went to an exhibition of the paintings of J.G. Brown. Brown was a popular late 19C artist specializing in poor but spunky children. Slick Victorian tripe, in short. And I thought: The poor curator! Years ago [I speculated] she picked Brown for her master's thesis, and then followed up with her dissertation, and now she is the world's leading expert on him and will spend the rest of her career with these ugly, morally repugnant pictures. (But it has to be admitted they are at least technically highly competent.) (And of course it is possible she actually likes Brown's work. I guess.)
July 27, 2011 at 10:18 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.