James Lachlan Macleod: The Second Disruption: The Free Church in Victorian Scotland and Origins of the Free Presbyterian Church (Scottish Historical Review Monographs Series)
June Szirotny: George Eliot's Feminism: "The Right to Rebellion"
E. W. McFarland: Protestants First
« Didn't we just do this? |
| This Week's Acquisitions »
To twitter, or not to twitter, that is the question.
August 23, 2011 in Web/Tech | Permalink
Yes! (At least tweet posts so we can share them about easily)
Jonathan Dresner |
August 23, 2011 at 07:42 PM
If you do, I will follow you! If not, I understand.
August 23, 2011 at 08:42 PM
ps The verb is "to tweet."
August 23, 2011 at 08:43 PM
Yes, I should use the proper verb :)
August 23, 2011 at 08:59 PM
August 23, 2011 at 09:14 PM
Some of your best posts are well over 140 characters, though.
Mr Punch |
August 23, 2011 at 09:39 PM
To quote myself quoting someone else: “What can be said in 140 characters is either trivial or abridged; in the first case it would be better not to say it at all, and in the second case it would be better to give it the space it deserves.”
August 24, 2011 at 03:01 AM
It has its uses.
August 28, 2011 at 01:02 PM
What's the point? Who wants to read a narrative of short interspersed off topic sentences? If I want that, I can always open ICMP debug mode and get all the real web gossip.
August 28, 2011 at 05:27 PM
Kerry NZ |
September 01, 2011 at 01:14 AM
Yes do! It's useful for expanding audience, driving traffic to blog, other sites, etc. You'd be a natural.
Benjamin L Clark |
September 08, 2011 at 01:48 PM
PS, you can find me @BLClark and lots of other biblio friends too.
The comments to this entry are closed.