While walking through the village this afternoon, I idly asked myself: if pressed, could I identify specific literary works that changed my attitude to an author, a period, or even literature in general? By "changed," I didn't mean "unconsciously shaped," in the way that my childhood immersion in nineteenth-century literature permanently formed my literary tastes. Moreover, I also ruled college courses out of the mix; the courses I took in Romantic and Victorian poetry during my sophomore year certainly altered my attitude to poetry, but in those cases the cumulative effect of a quarter's reading won out over individual works.
After chewing on this question for a while, I came up with three instances:
1. Alfred Bester, "Fondly Fahrenheit." I first read this short story at the age of eight, which was too young, strictly speaking. But even though I couldn't have explained how Bester was playing with the conventions of POV, I still realized for the first time that an author could play games with his narrative voices--that, in fact, a narrator might be unreliable (a term I wouldn't have known then, either).
2. Charles Dickens, Bleak House. There are many ways of experiencing a novel's greatness; this was the first time that I felt both astonished and humbled by an author's power. Bleak House also managed to convert me to Dickens, whose grotesques I had always found rather off-putting.
3. Sir Walter Scott, The Bride of Lammermoor. One of those moments when you realize that an author's reputation really does deserve to be dusted off and polished up. The novel also cured my allergy to Gothic fiction--which I must confess that I had not enjoyed in its Ann Radcliffe incarnation.
Bester was, indeed, mindblowing, and I say that as someone who read it later, and who was immersed in SF/F from a very early age.
I've definitely had the "overblown, until you read it" experience, too, with a lot of authors whose best books just didn't seem that attractive on the surface.....
Then there's the other experience: the book you read which highlights every flaw of an author all at once, which causes you to revise downward all their work in your estimation. I can think of a couple of authors -- Tom Clancy and Michael Crichton are the first ones who come to mind -- who've ruined my enjoyment of their earlier books with their later work.
Posted by: Ahistoricality | May 07, 2007 at 05:30 PM
The Bride of Lammermoor at least has the virtue of being funny, which most gothic works regrettably only manage unintentionally.
I still remember being whacked over the head by "Adonais" after years of thinking Shelley was a mere whiny egotist. And yes, Bleak House. Maybe the only book of which I remember reading the first page, as vividly as a drunk's first drink, the first time novelistic prose really jumped out and grabbed me more than the story.
And Isak Dinesen's "The Immortal Story," which might be the first time I realized that a story could be about stories and also BE a really good story.
Posted by: Marya | May 07, 2007 at 06:08 PM
I remember when I first discovered that a narrator might not exactly be on the up-and-up. I was reading Alice Walker's "Everyday Use," and I was aghast. How could this be?!?! It made me suspect every other narrator I had ever come across.
Posted by: Stephen Brown | May 07, 2007 at 07:06 PM
Reading THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO in the Robin Buss translation changed my view of Dumas as a wind-bag. It's a brilliantly plotted book!
Using HARD TIMES in a class where the students had NEVER read Dickens, and watching Dickens win them over--that was unforgettable.
Reading Henry James in my 40's and finally "getting" what he was doing in THE ASPEN PAPERS...priceless.
Posted by: George Kelley | May 07, 2007 at 08:46 PM
Some years ago I read Old Mortality shortly after reading a not-bad contemporary spy novel, and had the reaction "This is great! Scott fills the "intelligent political thriller niche" and does it better and offers so much more!" However, except for Waverly, the others I've picked up have been disappointing (relative to Old Mortality), at least from this perspective.
Posted by: Martin | May 08, 2007 at 05:41 PM
Wonderful to see Bride of Lammermoor on your list. My students love it, and so do I. There's never been another Caleb Balderstone.
Posted by: Ruth | May 08, 2007 at 11:02 PM
This is a great question, indeed. I'll say that my three are 1) Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita; 2) Kafka's "Metamorphosis" and 3) Morrison's Beloved.
Posted by: Dr. Dolen | May 17, 2007 at 03:15 PM